EQUIPMENT
EMAIL
PRINT
SubscribeZipp Sub 9 Disk Tested
Thu, 05/01/2008 - 3:14pm by alex
Zipp's Sub 9 is the perfect storm of geek. First of all, it's TT equipment. TT = nerd. Secondly, Zipp claims it produces thrust in a 15 degree crosswind. Physics = pocket protector. Finally, it gives me another chance to build a homemade wind tunnel to verify Zipp's claims (I love debunking dishonest marketing). Science experiments = atomic wedgies! But enough about my high school experiences. On to the geek.
For a history of the development of the Sub 9, and a quick explanation of the sail effect, go here. I came up with a very simple low friction rig to measure the relatively tiny forces. A steel rod goes through the test wheel's skewer hole. One end of the rod rests and pivots on a monofilament loop, while the other end is supported by another wheel, which rolls on a tabletop. To test the concept, I put together the basic rig and held a Vornado fan in front of the test wheel. With the fan pointed straight on, the wheel got pushed back. With the fan at an angle, the wheel moved towards the fan like a horror movie zombie. Amazing. The claims of thrust are absolutely legit.
Then I remembered something I heard. Paul Lew said that pretty much any disk wheel will produce thrust in a crosswind. Maybe Zipp just happens to be the first (or most cynical) to market it. I put my flat Zipp disk in the rig and...the same thing happened! This is not totally surprising, considering that any ol' piece of cardboard will fly like a frisbee. So is the Sub 9 a clever piece of marketing that touts something a sheet of plywood can do, or is it an honest innovation that produces so much more thrust that it warrants Zipp's claims? It was time to build a tunnel to isolate the wheel, and rent a high power fan.
I enclosed the wheel and fan in set paper. A string and pulley system pulled at the end of the wheel support rod to measure the thrust force. Since the forces in question were so small, the setup was very sensitive to tiny errors. The table had to be perfectly level, the support wheel had to be perfectly balanced. Even then, we're talking about a wheel suspended on a bowed rod, held by string at one end, supported on the other by a wheel listing from the weight of the test wheel. The whole contraption rattles and shakes when the fan is on. Let's just say that this test is far from perfect, and if you want to discount my results entirely I won't argue with you.
Here's the numbers. Measurements were taken at approximately 15 degrees and 22 mph:
Sub 9 disk with Zipp Tangente tubular: 62 grams
Clincher disk tubeless with Hutchinson Fusion: 29 grams
Zipp Tubular flat disk with Schwalbe Stelvio: 28.3 grams
808 front with Schwalbe Stelvio: 18.3 grams
Duchamp inspired pulley system records the forces and doubles as a cat toy.
Zipp's site claims 80g at 15 degrees, but doesn't specify wind speed. If Zipp's measurements were taken at 25 mph, then my numbers are dead on. If it was taken at the more typical 30 mph, then my numbers are way off. The front 808 number is there just for fun. A front hub should have much less drag than a rear hub, so you can't compare it to the rear disks.
So it seems the Sub 9 does generate enough extra lift to be considered a whole new class of wheel. But here's where the marketing talk gets slightly squirrelly. I don't doubt that at some wind speed you can get 80g of thrust from this wheel, but that's only a 43 gram improvement compared to a flat disk. Now, let's assume my numbers are reliable. At 28 mph the Sub 9 would generate 54 grams more thrust than a flat disk. For a rider with 2400 grams of drag at 28 mph, that would translate to 24 seconds saved over 40k. And that's the best case scenario, where the wind stays at an optimal 15 degree angle over the whole ride. Also, it's pretty safe to say that the wheel would perform best in isolation rather than at the back of a bike, right behind two churning legs.
So far I've only had the chance to ride the clincher outside, and it seems to be much less skittish than the flat disk. Maybe that bulge is absorbing some shock, maybe I'm imagining things. I'll be grabbing some people to help me do side by side tests for ride quality.
So in the end we're talking about an $1875 wheel with undeniable geek appeal that saves you 24 seconds over 40k. We cyclists spend so much money on gear I won't comment on whether that's money well spent. The wheel should be faster, it's up to you to decide if it's worth it.
RELATED ARTICLES
KCNC Ceramic Derailleur Pulleys - I received some KCNC ceramic pulleys from Fair
Bar Mitts Review - Gene Butcher is a fire fighter who lives in Michigan with his wife and two children. He is not a bike racer.
P4/Di2 Liveblogging build - Mark Purdy received a P4 build with Di2 from a not-to-be-named customer. The P4 was not designed with Di2 wiring in mind, so this is going to take some 'customization'.
Newest Comments
TOP 5 ARTICLES
-
Brainiac attack
-
Riccardo Ricco stays classy
-
UCI tip line
-
Bounty hunting
-
Publically humiliated again
JOURNALS
-
Peppo!
-
Peppo!
-
Section head text.
LATEST ARTICLES
Comments
Add a commentWhat's the drag coefficient of the moggie?
actual cross tailwinds very rare. winds would have to be so high that a little extra drag would be the least of your problems.
crosswind? Would drag be induced in a strong tailwind? hmmmmm.
Sounds like you're saying it can generate lift in a stall? I'm guessing it can generate lift beyond 15 degrees, but isn't it in a stall if the airflow separates?
thats a cute cat
if you know the protocol that zipp uses in the wind tunnel then you will know why they say the sub9 disc is the first negative drag disc. any disc will post negative drag when you start with attached airflow - i.e. go from 0 to 15 deg yaw. the thing that the sub9 does that no other disc has is to take detached airflow and post negative drag - i.e. going back from 30 deg to 15.
i was surprised to see that the sub 9 posts lower drag than the regular zipp disc in the tunnel also at 0 deg yaw. we had it set up in a Felt DA and there was a definite difference...
The test is totally real. I photoshopped myself in the top photo to make it look fake for 4/1. Don't have a Hed 3 to test, setup broken down now. I think anything that'll fly like a frisbee will by definition generate lift. It's just a matter of how much. Considering that the clincher disk and the tubular disk seem pretty similar in shape but have vastly different amounts of lift, it's probably pretty hard to come up with a shape as refined as the sub 9's. So my guess is that the Hed 3 generates some thrust, but probably very little.
kind of makes sense. it's like tacking in a sail boat. a solid sail would create more lift for the hull than an open mesh net
You want photoshop skills, here you are:
http://westwoodvelo.com/showthread.php?t=3992
Can you like create strong winds so you can pin the cat against the wall?That would be cool.
Ive met that pervert cat myself too, and assure you it is a creature of very loose morals. Hedonist!
whats the drag on the cat??? ears up, down, and with a tt helmet
photoshop work around his calves and back a little obvious
This is totally for real, which is why we love Andy, and feel kinda bad for him at the same time.
We also feel bad for Mrs Shen, because this condition is just gonna gets worse as he ages.
Will I find the name of the cat's creator on individual whiskers like on the snake scale in Blade Runner?
creating the computer-generated cat must have been the most expensive part of that shoot
Can you do the same test on a HED 3? They also claim forward thrust in a side wind.
I've met the cat. He's a good cat.
What is the cat looking at? Fishy, very fishy
After a careful read, i think this is real. Or I'm very fooled, great piece. Ingenious either way for sure
Actually, if anything, the wind tunnel stunt gave you tons of credibility.
Dont listen to em Andy, keep them guessing!
Did you ever return Steve Goldman's investment in your wind tunnel venture?
odd how you step in front of the camera every time the wheel moves forward...
odd that it is April Fools day. Last April Fools we had a full scale "wind tunnel." You've lost all your credibility. I'm not even sure if the cat is real or photoshopped at this point.
You got to attach the steel rod so that wheels slide forward not rotate...
Your cat is adorable!
What's the drag coefficient of the moggie?
actual cross tailwinds very rare. winds would have to be so high that a little extra drag would be the least of your problems.
crosswind? Would drag be induced in a strong tailwind? hmmmmm.
Sounds like you're saying it can generate lift in a stall? I'm guessing it can generate lift beyond 15 degrees, but isn't it in a stall if the airflow separates?
thats a cute cat
if you know the protocol that zipp uses in the wind tunnel then you will know why they say the sub9 disc is the first negative drag disc. any disc will post negative drag when you start with attached airflow - i.e. go from 0 to 15 deg yaw. the thing that the sub9 does that no other disc has is to take detached airflow and post negative drag - i.e. going back from 30 deg to 15.
i was surprised to see that the sub 9 posts lower drag than the regular zipp disc in the tunnel also at 0 deg yaw. we had it set up in a Felt DA and there was a definite difference...
The test is totally real. I photoshopped myself in the top photo to make it look fake for 4/1. Don't have a Hed 3 to test, setup broken down now. I think anything that'll fly like a frisbee will by definition generate lift. It's just a matter of how much. Considering that the clincher disk and the tubular disk seem pretty similar in shape but have vastly different amounts of lift, it's probably pretty hard to come up with a shape as refined as the sub 9's. So my guess is that the Hed 3 generates some thrust, but probably very little.
kind of makes sense. it's like tacking in a sail boat. a solid sail would create more lift for the hull than an open mesh net
You want photoshop skills, here you are:
http://westwoodvelo.com/showthread.php?t=3992
Can you like create strong winds so you can pin the cat against the wall?That would be cool.
Ive met that pervert cat myself too, and assure you it is a creature of very loose morals. Hedonist!
whats the drag on the cat??? ears up, down, and with a tt helmet
photoshop work around his calves and back a little obvious
This is totally for real, which is why we love Andy, and feel kinda bad for him at the same time.
We also feel bad for Mrs Shen, because this condition is just gonna gets worse as he ages.
Will I find the name of the cat's creator on individual whiskers like on the snake scale in Blade Runner?
creating the computer-generated cat must have been the most expensive part of that shoot
Can you do the same test on a HED 3? They also claim forward thrust in a side wind.
I've met the cat. He's a good cat.
What is the cat looking at? Fishy, very fishy
After a careful read, i think this is real. Or I'm very fooled, great piece. Ingenious either way for sure
Actually, if anything, the wind tunnel stunt gave you tons of credibility.
Dont listen to em Andy, keep them guessing!
Did you ever return Steve Goldman's investment in your wind tunnel venture?
odd how you step in front of the camera every time the wheel moves forward...
odd that it is April Fools day. Last April Fools we had a full scale "wind tunnel." You've lost all your credibility. I'm not even sure if the cat is real or photoshopped at this point.
You got to attach the steel rod so that wheels slide forward not rotate...
Your cat is adorable!
Post new comment